At this point one might start to understand that whatever you see when you pull back the curtain, is probably another curtain.

It looks like Frank Zappa may have understated his case.

Finding examples of the multi-curtain theatre works is a lot easier than I thought it would be. But to illustrate the point, let’s start with a prediction based on nothing but the hopefully quotable statement in the title.

We are being regularly told about the stunning abuses of public money in the US by DOGE. Certainly the same thing is true across all COMINTERN countries such as Canada, the UK, Germany, the EU in general, the UN and so on. To make up a representative example, DOGE might reveal that they have discovered two hundred and sixty million dollars earmarked to teach gay turtles how to put on a version of Hamlet as a trans person in Bububu Tanzania . And that fictional example is really a pretty mild exaggeration of the DOGE headlines.

With zero data points to support the following statement at this point in writing, and going purely on the model in the title, itself informed by a couple of decades, actually a lot more than a couple of decades of observing how nascent communist governments and polities operate, the following hypothesis is presented:

None or next to none of that money was ever sent to those ‘charities’. In fact they may not exist at all.

Or if they do, they were created as a beard for which to pretend to send money. In all likelyhood, the idea was to get people outraged about the nature of the recipients of the high amounts of cash and not look any farther. In fact, the money was likely used to find the invasion of Western nations by millions of people from Africa, especially the Islamic Maghreb and Islamic nations who are hostile to Jewish and Christian culture, and Greco-Roman Civilization, and intend to work triple shifts to bring it down. In fact, paid to bring it down.

Documents have been floating around Twitter showing that illegal migrants, and I mean illegal in a proper way, as opposed to simply redefining what constitutes an immigrant by rewriting the definition of an invader as a “migrant” or “Asylum seeker”, are being given very large sums of money to get here, and to settle in Western nations. They do not seem to have to work, and they do seem to live a pretty decent lifestyle and drive cars. Also both Canada and the US admitted that the illegals crossing the borders did not have to take the mRNA injections, like all the citizens of Western nations did. One can fairly safely assume the same for the UK, Germany and the rest of Western Europe.

This money was clearly printed for this purpose. But it had to be disguised as it might be too easy to spot the strategy if the budget read ‘3 trillion dollars to house and feed illegal Muslim migrants to the West”.

So what we see here is one arm of the Cloward Piven Strategy being synergistic with another.

As you may recall, Cloward-Piven has three main stratagems for making the US (and any other proper republic_ communist. 1. Print so much money it causes predictable problems like inflation and lack of confidence in the currency. 2. Open borders and flood the nation(s) with millions of people hostile to the local people and culture. 3. Grow the civil service massively with the main purpose being to oppress the actual cultural and legal citizens of that nation.

How that might look could be hiring 80,000 IRS agents and arming them for some reason.

It is expected that people will stop looking when they see the outrage-bait in the names of the places the money is alleged to go to. Maybe someone has flown over to Ireland and looked at the books of such projects as a DEI Musical in Ireland, or a Trans Gender opera in Columbia, etc. etc.

Here is a Tweet which actually speaks directly to the use of USAID money for the purpose of funding the invasion and destruction of Ireland. Interesting that they are this forthcoming on the matter. But it doesn’t address the likely reallocation of funds for the absurd and ‘woke’ projects which we think is taking place for this purpose. And as I search for the insane projects, data points that support the  hypothesis are actually appearing now.

?? BREAKING: Far-left NGO ‘Concern Worldwide’ has warned that mass layoffs at their Dublin headquarters, due to DOGE’s cuts to USAID, will force them to stop helping migrants from Third World Countries relocate to Ireland.

Sounds like good news to me! ?? pic.twitter.com/7Km1pzMpNL

— Cillian (@CilComLFC) March 13, 2025

There is a second axiom which one may wish to add to any analytical processes they use to understand what is actually going on when listening to the dialectical explanation from nearly all media to one degree or another. And that is that:

whenever someone tells you that a thing cannot happen because the law says, and rules are, and the procedure works like this…

they are either people with poor observational skills or they are trying to live in a safe past where there was predictability based on the rules a nation used as the central doctrine of its law and culture. This site predicted 2 years ago that Mark Carney would be the PM without getting elected to Parliament, or by any of the normal means a person becomes PM. Now at this point some people will take a post hoc view of this and explain how this happened such that it is still procedurally normal somehow. But the same can be said of all the unprecedented and tyrannical acts that have happened in Canada for decades now albeit far less subtly since Trudeau became the Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Parliament of Canada, or if you prefer, General Secretary of the Workers’ Party of Canada”.

Before each new Tyrannical measure during Covid, anyone who dared suggest what the Trudopian state would do next was called a conspiracy nut. Then after he enacted the exactly predicted measure, the same people would claim it was lawful and a needed policy.

The basis of this second axion was the reversing of process to result.

In a “democracy” or real republic, processes and procedures are established in law such that the outcome maintains the public’s rights and the state’s powers remain limited. And perhaps more importantly, that the procedures determine the truth of a matter to the best of their ability and if truth cannot be established, the matter is dropped as in the case of a criminal court. But in a communist polity, institutions operate dialectically. The process to outcome is reversed. The state decides what outcome they want, and then adjust the process to give that result. And with that understanding, no pouring over Canadian law books or history of politics in Canada was needed to know Carney would become the Supreme Leader with little to no scrutiny by the media, or any typically normal method of getting to that position. The Prorogation of Parliament for the purpose of installing Carney was clearly not procedure and John Carpay made an excellent case that it was in fact illegal. And he is likely right. But Canada no longer operates that way. As we said, the method/procedure to outcome, or Socratic Aristotelian and even Kung Fu Tze (Confusion) paradigm has been reversed.

So moving to at least what may be potential examples, we have two cognitive tools with which to arrive at a more likely prediction for all things political, (which increasingly is all things), the first is that behind every curtain is another curtain, the first revealing something the public will likely be content with as sufficiently outrageous to not pull back the second, and that the method of Socratic civilization, to establish rational processes for truthful and beneficial outcomes has been reversed , such that the outcomes are pre determined and the processes to arrive at them are adjusted before the fact, to give the desired outcome for a communist state. Perhaps an evil version of a posteriori thought, or an ab initio manipulation. It is Evil because the outcomes are always destructive to the public and civilization. Especially at the level of rights.

1. Brian Lilley. The curtain hides another curtain

This is the Liberal Party.
They have been telling us for years that if you oppose the carbon tax, you hate the planet.
Now they are bragging about cancelling it.
Which they haven’t actually done. pic.twitter.com/363RwGkxFA

— Brian Lilley (@brianlilley) March 15, 2025

2. CBC in on the Carney con. This is an example of both axioms. Carney pretends to remove the carbon tax when really he is moving it to another level of the producer to consumer chain, which will likely lead to higher taxes but not called a Carbon tax. It will also have tax on the tax. Carney has said to a closed group of people in Ottawa’s affluent Rockcliffe Park in a talk he gave last fall, that he intended to past Net Zero to Negative Net Zero. I’ll let other people work on what that means.

The second axiom is where he signed an OIC to remove the tax, but that isn’t, as the unobservant are saying, how an OIC is done. Carney is replicating the American system of executive orders which does not exist in the Canadian system, at least de jure. So his critics are saying that this order in council is invalid because he is using powers he doesn’t have.

We would argue that he is making powers up, and they will be enforced, so he does have them. And once it is established that he has executive powers like the US president, and no one squawks too much because we all want the carbon tax to go, his next batch will be profoundly bad for Canadians, and there will be no way to stop them, because he did one, and everyone accepts then that he can. And of course, the police and RCMP do what they are told. So yeah. he signs the cheques so to speak, so he can take these powers for himself as he sees fit. Read the images below the CBC video.

CBC plays along with the Carney Carbon Tax ‘elimination’ deception

The Carbon Tax has not been eliminated and there is no Order-in-Council on the books

“But Carney welcomed cameras and reporters in to see his new cabinet and watch him sign away this carbon tax with an order… https://t.co/a6e6zkmBpO pic.twitter.com/NbuYJpD6hy

— cbcwatcher (@cbcwatcher) March 15, 2025

3. Here is a near perfect example of a guy who is paradigmatically locked to a system that was dismantled in all but name many years ago now. In a very real way, we could call this man controlled opposition, even if he is fully committed to our side of the ideological issues. His inability to see what is actually happening based on how he thinks things are supposed to work, makes him an agent of the enemy.

Since I’ve gotten ridiculous replies, this piece of paper isn’t an order-in-council, which comes from the governor-general, and it isn’t a recommendation to the GG for an OinC. It’s a fake document masquerading as a legal order by a PM who claiming powers he doesn’t have. https://t.co/lnaz589z1P

— Yuan Yi Zhu (@yuanyi_z) March 15, 2025

The National Post offers this article which has a brief nod to how unusual this Order in Council is, but not detailing that it is not Canadian procedure, and goes on to explain that the motive is probably to take the main sail out of Piere Poilievre’s campaign, mostly about removing the Carbon tax. But it does explain how Carney is doing with the Carbon tax what a three card monty dealer does with the queen. Maybe that’s how he got his last name.

4. The New York Times has now moved to showing us the second curtain on Covid measures.

We Were Badly Misled About the Event That Changed Our Lives

Source: https://vladtepesblog.com/2025/03/16/at-this-point-one-might-start-to-understand-that-whatever-you-see-when-you-pull-back-the-curtain-is-probably-another-curtain/