One mechanism by which the Canadian election could be stolen for Carney

It is our firm conviction that all rules, regulations, procedures and processes in Canada and across most of the West has been replaced from ones which work on Socratic principles to ones which work dialectically.

This means that instead of a process operating to create the outcome based on the evidence and reality uncovered by the process, such as a trial for example, the outcome desired is determined in advance of the process and the process is tuned to give that politically expedient result.

The procedures we use in the West exist mostly as vestigial remnants of a republic/Democratic nation state and have been returned as described but are already being replaced in Canada and Great Britain as a couple of examples, with new more blatant dialectical or communist procedures.

The placement of mark Carney as PM without his being elected to anything is one example. We predicted he would be years ago, without any idea how. It was enough to know this is what the PTB (Powers that be) wanted, and this is what they would get. Then there was the unprecedented prorogation of parliament, unprecedented both in terms of its length and more importantly, the reasons. In this case so the Liberal Party could complete the transformation of its leadership using a lightly bearded coronation process to replace Carney’s proxy, Trudeau, for Carney himself.

So now the question is, how will the election be taken by the Carney Liberals in a way that gives some kind of plausible deniability to a steal.

In other words, it doesn’t really matter to them if we know they cheated. Just like the US election in 2020, it only matters that there is enough doubt to stop people from taking effective action. The usual voices of people who think they are on top of things will say, “Yes it is very unusual, but according to rule XX00 and in 1745,,,” and the irony there is, none of those rules and precedents apply anymore. They are just used to beard the dialectical methods used to actually disguise things.

A reader of Vlad sent in the following article from La Press (auto-translated from French)

The meaty part is here:

let’s explore the different scenarios…

First scenario: the liberals come out winners without obtaining an absolute majority. They must then make alliances to lead the country.

But at the moment, we need’a solid leader to face the American president who likes to exploit the flaws of his vis-a-vis.

We need’a prime minister who has all the’agility required to negotiate with Donald Trump.

And we need’a captain who holds the public finances of’a firm hand, without having to make costly compromises with the’ opposition to keep the government afloat.

172 Number of seats required to obtain an absolute majority (50 % + 1) of the 343 seats in the federal Parliament

Second scenario: the Conservatives elect more members of parliament without obtaining an absolute majority. In this situation, the rules are clear: the outgoing prime minister has the right to’ be the first to attempt to form the government¹.

The article is a propaganda piece utilizing Anti-Trump sentiments to push for Carney.

But the part that matters is the last line: “ In this situation, the rules are clear: the outgoing prime minister has the right to’ be the first to attempt to form the government¹.”

And there you have it. Even if I is admitted that Poilievre has more seats than any other party, without a total majority, Carney can form a government with the odious NDP leader Jagmeet Sing and we are from the frying pan into the fire.