Cracking the Code: Dr. Merritt on the Hidden Truth Behind the Vials

Dr. Lee Merritt has never been one to shy away from controversy. In a recent discussion, she tackled one of the most contentious issues of our time: the contents of those widely distributed injections.

Many people, including experienced researchers, debate what is really inside these vials, and Dr. Merritt offers a unique perspective that challenges mainstream narratives. She insists that the central question is not simply whether the vials contain mRNA or spike proteins but rather if they contain anything resembling what pharmaceutical companies claim at all.

Why We May Never Know Everything

One of the key points Dr. Merritt drives home is that it is impossible to confirm what is in every single vial. The production rate alone raises suspicion. As she explains, if Pfizer truly began producing these doses only after receiving Emergency Use Authorization, the speed required would be nearly miraculous… on the order of producing vaccine doses at a rate that defies typical manufacturing practices.

Furthermore, a valid method to comprehensively test these vials does not exist. Contrary to a science-fiction-like vision in which you drop a bit of fluid into a futuristic machine to learn its every component, Dr. Merritt reminds us that real-world testing is far more complicated. Labs must already know what they are looking for. The array of substances people claim to find—ranging from fragments of genetic code to graphene structures… suggests something far beyond the familiar concept of “mRNA plus lipids.”

Questioning the mRNA Claim

Central to Dr. Merritt’s skepticism is the claim that the vials must be kept at extremely low temperatures. Early on, Pfizer and Moderna emphasized that these injections needed to be stored at around minus 80 degrees Celsius. (I spoke with a doctor in Clinton, Iowa at the hospital there, He assured me that the hospital did NOT have was freezer that could maintain these temperatures – just saying)

Over time, public attention to these super-cold requirements faded, and the guidelines themselves shifted in many places. Some facilities allowed thawing over hours or even days, leading Dr. Merritt to ask how fragile mRNA could survive these lax conditions if the fundamental science insists on maintaining a consistent sub-freezing environment.

She also points out that researchers analyzing sequences supposedly taken from the injections often fail to find the full-length genetic instructions corresponding to the spike protein. Instead, they discover chopped-up segments and pieces that do not align with the officially stated blueprint. To Dr. Merritt, that discrepancy should raise questions about what is genuinely being injected.

Beyond the Spike Protein: The Optogenetics Connection

As Dr. Merritt delved deeper into the genetics, she encountered the work of scientists who research “optogenetics,” an emerging field that uses light to control cells within living tissue. Certain “opsins,” or proteins sensitive to specific wavelengths, can be combined with mammalian cells to create new ways of manipulating biological functions.

These manipulations can be benign, such as controlling a mouse’s heart rhythm, or more concerning, such as changing behavior when specific light frequencies are applied.

She references real-world events where large groups of vaccinated individuals suddenly collapsed or developed severe reactions during concerts or crowded gatherings. While official accounts often attribute such tragedies to “crushes” in a dense crowd, Dr. Merritt questions whether another factor could be at play: an external trigger… such as specialized frequencies of light or sound… interacting with something in the body that was introduced by these injections.

Inconsistent Contents and Possible Intentions

One of Dr. Merritt’s most unsettling claims is that these injections may vary significantly from batch to batch. She notes that under Emergency Use Authorization, companies do not have to disclose every component they include; they must only disclose what they believe gives the product its efficacy. Everything else remains hidden.

Consequently, the shots could contain different substances from one batch to another, explaining why some individuals show extreme adverse reactions while others remain entirely unaffected.

These discrepancies extend beyond the mere presence or absence of mRNA. Reports have emerged from independent researchers and physicians who say they have discovered everything from micro-scale structures resembling circuitry to graphene oxide.

Dr. Merritt points to how easily such observations are dismissed or hidden, reinforcing her argument that the manufacturing and oversight processes are far less rigorous than the public assumes.

Transmission, Shedding, and Hidden Dangers

Dr. Merritt also addresses the idea of shedding. She cites FDA documents from 2015 suggesting that researchers had to be aware of transmissible elements in the context of gene-based products. This admission alone, she argues, indicates that mainstream medicine has long recognized there is more going on with these technologies than a simple immune response.

Whether through physical contact, airborne particles, or even electromagnetic factors, something may be passed from a recently vaccinated individual to others.

Her final warning revolves around what she calls an old deception. Traditionally, viruses have been viewed as standalone infectious agents, yet the Latin term “virus” translates to “toxin.” She suggests that, historically, what we label a virus could, in fact, be toxic material introduced into the body. If that idea holds any validity, we may be misled on a grand scale about how these technologies function and what they truly contain.

The Unfinished Investigation

Dr. Merritt does not claim to have all the answers, but she insists the conversation must remain open. Her background in both surgery and research fuels her determination to question established stories about manufacturing, distribution, and safety guidelines.

What she offers is not a tidy conclusion but a challenge to look deeper, demand stronger evidence, and keep an open mind about the medical products continually heralded as breakthroughs. It’s a call for transparency and accountability in the medical field.

Whether you agree with her conclusions or not, her commentary underscores a vital point: if nobody can fully prove what is in these vials, we should at least remain curious, skeptical, and determined to uncover the truth, for the sake of our future health. The interview with Jane Ruby is here.

The post Cracking the Code: Dr. Merritt on the Hidden Truth Behind the Vials appeared first on Off The Grid News.

Source: https://www.offthegridnews.com/what-they-dont-want-you-to-know/cracking-the-code-dr-merritt-on-the-hidden-truth-behind-the-vials/